The White House serially flirts with indictable behavior. This is not news. But we are hearing more and more about the Administration offering people plum jobs for doing their bidding.
Hans A. von Spakovsky has a post on the Corner which touches on it but doesn’t, in my mind, go far enough.
There are at least three bribes that we know about that clearly violate 18 U.S.C. § 211, which states:
Whoever solicits or receives, either as a political contribution, or for personal emolument, any money or thing of value, in consideration of the promise of support or use of influence in obtaining for any person any appointive office or place under the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both. Whoever solicits or receives any thing of value in consideration of aiding a person to obtain employment under the United States either by referring his name to an executive department or agency of the United States or by requiring the payment of a fee because such person has secured such employment shall be fined under this title, or imprisoned not more than one year, or both. This section shall not apply to such services rendered by an employment agency pursuant to the written request of an executive department or agency of the United States.
Plain reading of indicates that the White House has committed felonious behavior by:
- Offering Rep. Joe Sestak (D., Pa.) a high-ranking job in the administration if he would withdraw his challenge to Sen. Arlen Specter in the Pennsylvania primary election.
- Offering to Colorado state House Speaker Andrew Romanoff a job in the U.S. Agency for International Development if he would withdraw his primary challenge to Sen. Michael Bennet (D., Colo.).
- Obama nominated Matheson’s brother, Scott M. Matheson, Jr. to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit . His brother, Democrat Congressman Jim Matheson of Utah, has been listed as “undecided” on ObamaCare.
Article II, Section 4 of the Constitution says,
“The President, Vice President and all civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors.”
Von Spakovosky does not call for impeachment. There is clearly have grounds for impeaching Obama. This, I think, is a weakness if his article.
Update: Michelle Malkin is not impressed either:
Let us consider the possibility, for a brief moment, that this is all merely coincidence. Is the White House so fantastically blind and tone-deaf that it failed to detect the blood-red flags and blaring alarm bells that Scott Matheson’s judicial nomination would raise coming on the very day President Obama was wooing his brother, Jim? Incorrigibly corrupt or incorrigibly stupid. Take your pick.
She’s right. It can’t be both. (well it could, but…)
Read Full Post »